The Argumentum Ad Populum Fallacy suggests that of attempting to win popular assent to a culture by arousing the feeling and enthusiasms of the multitude. Therefore, we can conclude that Citizen Kane advertized his feelings towards the lower class and how the people can expect his best interests into making it reveal for them. There is also the Irrelevant Conclusion fallacy since Kane had determine his victory over the campaign with place knowing if he had won. I also noticed that Kane used words like under-privileged, under-paid, and under-fed preferably of poor, low-income, and hungry. These words are called Euphemisms which are words that sound more appealing to the audience and help avoid offending people.
I felt that Charles Kane made efficient arguments and counterarguments in his speech.
He prototypic starts off explaining how he had not made any promises in the beginning of his campaign because he initially did not deliver any hope for being elected. After finding out how the people felt about him, he felt he had more than just a chance and knows he go away win the campaign. He then proceeds to state how Boss Jim Getty is the wrong candidate and the proper candidate should be himself. He sounded passionate throughout his speech which helped captivate his audience yet it lacked facts to determine why Getty should not win. His counterargument stated how he promised to bequeath for the lower-class but then followed to conclude that he could not make any promises, and his only promise would be to charge Jim Getty. I believe that this was an...If you want to get a adequate essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment