In Panama City, Florida, a fifteen year old and her convey were trying to dispense the young girls yet unborn youngster for $ vitamin D and a ten year old car. Although it is against the honor to sell babies, they believed that they had a moral right to do so because, as the girl argued, the indulge belongs to me.In all aspects of superstar?s daily life, there are numerous decisions to undertake. in all acts that an individual decides to do are geared towards a ware that in one way or the other benefits the vigorous person of the action. As in the case of the fifteen-year-old mother-to-be, and her father, who is seeking to sell her yet unborn child for $500 and in tack for a ten-year-old car, there are quite some implications that hatful be deduced from the situation, which amplifies the concepts of subjectivism, relativism, and egoism. Analyzing the situation using the subjectivist critique will send word that the fifteen-year-old mother?s action is infallible as she rubrics, the sis belongs to her and so she has the moral right to exchange it for cash and for properties.
such action, for a subjectivist, is to be construed as valid for her actions cannot be judged fit to someone else?s standardised not even the standard of morality or legality set forth by any competent authority such as the uprightness prohibiting the marketing of babies (born or unborn) as promulgated by Congress. The subjectivist reveal of the situation expressed by the daughter?s claim of her moral right to sell the unborn baby as based alone on the claim that she ?owns? the baby. Hence, basing on her claim, she is convince that there is nothing wrong with selling the unborn baby even for the measly price (for a human life) of $500 and...
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment