Morality is the quality of being furbish uped with the judgment or financial statement of goodness or badness of character and behavior. Although this may be the actual ?broad? definition, societal interpretation of the word seems to be more vague, and precise, yet not accurate. parliamentary law has clearly dress out standards for what is morall(a)y right and wrong. Most of these standards are completely base off of ethics, religion, and what the world deems as virtuous. Society now claims that engineering is corrupting the minds of people; that engineering is opposing moral principles and definite religious and ethical precepts. This is, in fact, a fallacy, or quite an a scapegoat. Technology is being used as an thus far to conceal specific weaknesses, which humanity has yet to attain. These weaknesses are a lack of control and organization. Society is merely trying to bugger off someone or something blameworthy of its faults. It just so happens that technology is one of its victims. Medical technology (or biotechnology), and video games are examples of scapegoats utilised by society to explain why humanity has a difficult time upholding its morals.
Although biotechnology has provided the world with many benefits, it is still regarded as being impure.
For instance, ?even though medical advances claim knocked out killers such as polio, tuberculosis, and scarlet and other fevers, we counterbalance with alarm when considering the possible applications of genetic engineering,? (Swan, p. 6, 2008). From there, society?s concern expands to question the morality of medical technology in general. Thus, the emergency for a wall to be built around all technology as something to be contained is essential, before it gets out of hand. Society tends to blame medicine and biotechnology for disrupting moral principles, whereas society, itself, is truly at fault for having a lack of control and allowing the ?impurity? to...
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment