What's the difference between act (AU) and rule utilitarianism (RU)? What are the strengths and weaknesses of each?

Whats the difference between act (AU) and get hold

utilitarianism (RU)? What are the strengths and

weaknesses of each?

In the one-time(prenominal) Utilitarianism was judged on each individual action, after many eld pasted

then Utilitarianism was judge on the consequences of the truth and a lie. Your

consequences are judged on thoughts such as a promise you made or the truth you was

told. The new version of the theory Rule Utilitarianism, which is distinguishing it from

the pilot burner theory, now commonly called crook-Utilitarianism. So

this manner that Act Utilitarianism shows the happiness of a person that is helping with

another person needs. Bottom line is that Act Unitarianism looks at the individual action

of a person and rule Utilitarianism means that you are reviewed from an action.

Au is a theory used to judge office and wrong based on its outcome. The

end result of the action is a bigger part of the picture than why it was done

in the first place. It is a strong theory because it looks at the

consequences of an act, weak because it overlooks the question of why an

act is right or wrong to begin with.

Ru is a elan of using rules agreed upon by a group of commonwealth within a

society. In order to thrive in that society, sealed rules apply to a persons

actions.



What rules would make the people happy is the rule to best follow

according to RU.

AU is the conventional form of Utilitarianism which states that moral actions should be

guided by what would infer the most happiness. The benefits of this theory is that is

provides a systematic system to picture moral actions. When presented with a moral

dilemna, one must only realize the moral action that will provide the greatest amount

of happiness.

If you unavoidableness to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com



If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper