Cat Bill

Governor Stevenson opposes the passing of the khat Bill that results cats to be interpreted away from streets to protect birds. By being straight anterior the governor uses language to persuade the senate that this gamin is unnecessary.
The governor uses particularised words to prove his point. Stevenson organizes his argument by listing the outcomes if the bar passes such as, how it would affect the people and the cats. For example, this bill will allow people to call the police to jug the cats in click unfairly. The governor clearly points that it is irrational to place cats behind interdict since it is their nature to roam around the streets. By using imprison the governor makes the bill sound foolish due to the fact that only those who commit a crime are lay in jail, not cats. The governor argues that it is their nature to roam around, and that the bill will make a game hunt to a behavior that is as old as time.



By arguing that it is nature the governor persuades the senate that this bill will go against natural life which is unreasonable. Stevenson calls it a game hunt to evidence how irrational the excuse to go after cats is. His word preference of as old as time gives a rich picture to the senate to show how one cannot control a cats behavior. through diction the governor criticizes the bill.
The governor depicts the Cat Bill as irrational through his use of language. By mocking the Cat Bill the governor compares both the cats natural actions to those of a criminal.If you ask to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com



If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper