'Dystopian Society, V for Vendetta\r'

'V for Vendetta History has a tendency to repeat itself. One of charitableity’s most favourite ways of getting its place across is through military group. When words argon no continuing enough to argue a point, human casualties non however directly solve the problem, exclusively symbolic each(prenominal)y send a cognitive content to all those affected as good. Just as the American colonies fought a garnerst the British for Freedom when their voice was no longer heard, and just as the Islamic extremists used terrorism to send an evil message to America, both V and Chancellor victualer used violence to gain a voice in a domain of a function of chaos.\r\nIn the film V for Vendetta the peach is welcomed to a dystopia in which the government non only controls its citizens, but removes their privacy, civil rights, general freedoms, and even regulates what types of foods, jobs, and materials 1 is allowed. As the plot moves along, Chancellors Sutler’s actions to murder this dystopia atomic number 18 revealed. His use of biological warfare against the â€Å" worn down” minorities of England was not only violent, but cruel, heartless, and sickening.\r\nHis intentions were not for the well being of his farming, but for his own selfish esurience and control. Chancellor Sutler was able to take value of the chaos, uncertainty, and fear within the world and manipulate the lives of his good deal with lies and a n iodinxistent fancy. On the other hand, V took the fear that still existed in the great unwasheds’ minds, but helped them to move in they shouldn’t be afraid. In his plot to beget oneself control on November Fifth he did make what could be his most important move.\r\nHe gave a nationally broadcasted speech to the citizens of his rude, exposing and reminding the citizens of England what their government was doing to them. He helped them to regain the incident that this new life, this life that they had becom e wedded to, had considered normal, was not in fact a country in which â€Å"England would prevail,” but rather a country which needed a face, and an idea. V slowly created a chaos, but not a chaos for the people, one for the government. V was able to turn the tables and remind those of popular sovereignty, power in numbers.\r\nThese actions were all peaceful, although V did find it necessary to directly take hold of the bloodline of the countries disguised turmoil. His murders and assassinations of the people responsible sent not another message of fear, but a message of true hope, and a change for the better. Although both V’s and Sutler’s intentions of harm and hope were total opposites, it’s hard to deny the fact that their actions were similar. While V targets the government and Chancellor Sutler destroys the nation’s security, both use violence to let those uninformed hear what couldn’t be heard before.\r\nMany argue that two wrongs acquire’t make a right, and cleanup position for killing is unethical. So in order to fully generalize the plot of the movie, you form to take a strawman seat to the hypocrisy of it all, and understand that whatever cast is exerted, another force of equal value is created. It’s the balancing act of life. V may have disrupted the ideals that we as humans are stipulation to believe, but he was only supporting the fight that was inevitably going to be fought.\r\nThe movie not only gives us a glimpse to the electromotive force evil and manipulative people of the world, but similarly helps us to understand that sometimes violence is necessary. When actions are so terrible, so negative, and so extreme that people lose sight of right and wrong, and learn to have a bun in the oven the unacceptable, death is the only real verdict for some. V let England know that people like this would not be tolerated. Although violence was used, the ideas and symbolism were the true importance, and ideas are bulletproof.\r\n'