Research on The History of Breast Augmentation Techniques

No technique is foolproof, and non without risks.

tit augmentation is not new. It was start-off tried in the 1890s in Vienna apply paraffin injections which often led to infections, a meander reaction to the paraffin, granuloma formation, and a hardening of the injected material, causing the affair to rapidly fall out of favor 2. In the fifties and 1960s, liquid silicone was injected for breast augmentation, but this led to tear down worse problems because many of those performing the augmentation were not doctors and they were not using medical grade silicone. Additives and impurities in the silicone these non-medical practitioners use caused complications from prolonged inflammation and granulation reactions to the material. Some early medical practitioners used autologous fat transplants into the breast, but because of liquefaction and reabsorption of the fat by the patient's body, the results were asymmetric breasts, internal scarring and calcifications, and residual scarring in the area the fat was taken from (usually the abdomen and/or buttocks).

In the 1950s, the Mayo Clinic introduced a polyvinyl shnorr (Ivalon) for breast augmentation3. Although it showed promise at firstborn, infections, capsular contractures, contraction of the sponge causing a decrease in breast volume, tissue reactions, a possibility of the risk of cancer, and other tissue growths became problematic, not only in themselves,

In 1965, the first saline implant - the Simaplast prosthesis - was introduced5. The imposture had a safety device inflatable display case which was filled recentlyr implantation, then sealed, but making waterage rates were high - up to 50 percent. American manufacturers developed a silicon rubber inflatable shell, which had lower deflation rates. Silicone gel implants remained the near fashionable because of the deflation problems with saline implants. However, in the late 1960s, the silicone implants were known to leak gel particles through the outer shell membrane, and a protecting(prenominal) outer shell of saline surrounding the inner pump of silicone was used to try and protect against this. Polyurethane cover implants were introduced in the 1980s to reduce capsular

Springer, R. (1999).

Saline augmentation mammoplasty: nursing implications. Plastic Surgical Nursing, 19, 9-17.

The 1960s saw the development of the first silicone gel prosthesis by Dow Corning Company4. In 1962, the first Silastic implant was used - a silicone rubber shell filled with silicone gel. The product was refined over the old age with reduction of the shell thickness, Dacron patches to fix the implant to the tissue, elimination of seams on the implant, less viscous gels, and then removal of the adhesive patches. However, late complications developed in patients with displacement of implants, erosion of the inframammary site, infections, and hematomas. Capsular contracture was the most common complication - in as many as 40 percent to 70 percent of cases in somewhat studies.

but also in that they made removal of the sponge implants difficult. A later version of the Ivalon sponge was a custom-tailored version, rationalise and shaped to size, with the center removed. The cut-out center was sealed in an air-tight polyethylene sac and reinserted into the shell and the opening sealed. In this way, it was hoped to occlusion body fluids from accumulating in the sponge and reduce the possibility of infection. Variations on this t
Ordercustompaper.com is a professional essay writing service at which you can buy essays on any topics and disciplines! All custom essays are written by professional writers!